Passivhaus EnerPHit certification for existing buildings: What is it and how to achieve it?

As the demand for energy-efficient buildings continues to grow, the retrofit of existing buildings to meet modern efficiency standards has become increasingly important.

Passivhaus EnerPHit certification for existing buildings: What is it and how to achieve it?

As the demand for energy-efficient buildings continues to grow, the retrofit of existing buildings to meet modern efficiency standards has become increasingly important.

EnerPHit: certificación Passivhaus para rehabilitación de edificios existentes. ¿Qué es y cómo conseguirla?

Passivhaus EnerPHit certification provides a rigorous and effective framework for deep energy retrofits, ensuring optimal energy performance and comfort. This article outlines the pathways to achieving EnerPHit certification, its advantages, and considerations for partial renovations.

Pathways for achieving EnerPHit certification

There are two primary pathways to achieving EnerPHit certification: performance-based and prescriptive, together with common requirements that apply to both. Let’s take a look at each one.

1. EnerPHit Energy Demand Method

This performance-based approach is similar to Passivhaus certification for new builds but with slightly relaxed heating and cooling demand requirements, adjusted for the seven global climate zones defined by the Passivhaus Institute, shown in Figure 2.

Figura 2: Criterios de demanda energética EnerPHit  (Fuente: Passivhaus Institute, Criterios para edificios,  Versión 10c del 20/09/2024)
Figura 2: Criterios de demanda energética EnerPHit (Fuente: Passivhaus Institute, Criterios para edificios, Versión 10c del 20/09/2024)

2. EnerPHit Building Component Method

This prescriptive approach sets maximum thermal transmittance values (“U-values”) for each building element, requires control of solar gains, and establishes minimum performance requirements for mechanical ventilation with heat or moisture recovery, depending on the climate zone (Figure 4). The aim is to ensure that the retrofit is highly energy-efficient and safe with respect to moisture-related pathologies.

Figure 4: EnerPHit Building Component Method (Source: Passivhaus Institute, Criteria for Buildings, Version 10c as of 1/20/2023)
Figure 4: EnerPHit Building Component Method (Source: Passivhaus Institute, Criteria for Buildings, Version 10c as of 1/20/2023)
Figura 5: Rehabilitación EnerPHit por Componentes, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Marcove (Fuente: Jose Hevia)
Figure 5: Single-family home certified to EnerPHit standard, Component Method, Marcove, Sant Cugat, Catalonia (Source: Jose Hevia)

Common requirements (for both pathways)

For both pathways, there are common requirements. Regarding the level of air infiltration, the maximum allowed value in the airtightness (Blower Door) test is n50 = 1.0 air changes per hour (instead of n50 = 0.6 ach required by Passivhaus for new builds). Additionally, the total renewable primary energy consumption of the building is limited, depending on whether it is certified as EnerPHit Classic, Plus, or Premium (Plus and Premium include renewable energy generation), as shown in Figure 6. Each certification class has its respective seal, shown in Figure 7.

Figure 6: General EnerPHit criteria (irrespective of the method) (Source: Passivhaus Institute, Criteria for Buildings, Version 10c as of 1/20/2023)
Figure 6: General EnerPHit criteria (irrespective of the method) (Source: Passivhaus Institute, Criteria for Buildings, Version 10c as of 1/20/2023)
EnerPHit Classic
EnerPHit Plus
EnerPHit Premium

Figure 7: EnerPHit Classic, Plus y Premium seals

Advantages of EnerPHit certification

Pursuing EnerPHit certification provides numerous benefits:

  • Holistic deep energy retrofit: Ensures comprehensive upgrades that prevent moisture damage associated with partial retrofits.
  • Up to 90% energy savings: Significant reductions in space heating and cooling costs.
  • Enhanced indoor air quality: Mechanical ventilation with heat recovery (MVHR) ensures a controlled, fresh, and comfortable air supply.
  • Superior thermal comfort: High-performance insulation and airtightness eliminate cold spots and drafts.
  • Efficient HVAC systems: Optimized heating, cooling, and hot water systems reduce energy consumption.
  • Lower life-cycle carbon emissions: Avoids “lock-in” effects where partial renovations leave high CO2 emissions unaddressed for years.

Step-by-step retrofits and partial renovations

For phased retrofits, buildings can receive pre-certification for all steps up to the final complete retrofit, under an EnerPHit Retrofit Plan (ERP). This ensures that when all phases are complete, the building meets EnerPHit standard. Pre-certification offers reassurance to owners and planners that performance targets will be achieved and helps spread the investment over a longer period.

EnerPHit Unit certification is also available for individual apartments within multi-residential buildings. This requires:

  • Airtightness verification: Either a pressure test (qe 50 ≤ 1.0 m³/(hm²)) or detailed documentation and photographic evidence of airtight construction.
  • Connection to adjacent spaces: Measures to ensure the retrofit works don’t generate moisture damage in neighbouring units.

Conclusions

EnerPHit offers several pathways to achieve Passivhaus certification. When carrying out an energy retrofit, it’s especially important to implement improvements in a way that avoids moisture damage. EnerPHit certification provides reliable and safe methodologies to avoid this, ensuring that existing buildings meet modern standards of efficiency and comfort, while significantly reducing their environmental impact.

Which Christmas tree is greener? Real, artificial, or potted?

A real tree which we then take to the recycling centre? A real tree, but potted, which we could then re-use every year. Or a plastic tree which we could re-use for several years.

Which Christmas tree is greener? Real, artificial, or potted?

We’re having family to stay in our new house for Christmas, and so I got talking to my daughter a few days ago about what we were going to do for a Christmas tree. Some years ago, we made a Christmas tree mobile, with sticks and leaves, which we decorate with LED lights and a choice selection of festive tinsel and Christmas ornaments. But what about pushing the boat out this year?

Imagen árbol de navidad

We ended up having an interesting, and fully woke discussion, about what would be the most environmentally friendly solution:

  • A real tree which we then take to the recycling centre?
  • A real tree, but potted, which we could then re-use every year (if we could keep it alive…).
  • Or a plastic tree (which we weren’t very keen on, but…) which we could re-use for several years.

So which option has the lowest carbon footprint? Here’s what the data says:

Artificial Tree: Manufacturing a 2 m PVC tree emits about 40 kg CO₂e. If you reuse it for 10+ years, its annual impact drops to ~4 kg/year, making it competitive (that is: 40 kg CO₂e spread over 10 years of use, means the average yearly emissions are 4 kg CO₂e/a …).

Real Tree (which is then composted): this option generates round 5 kg CO₂e per year. Composting or chipping is key to keep emissions low.

Real Tree (Landfilled): this is the worst option—up to 16 kg CO₂e per year due to the methane emissions from the rotting biomass (methane was a Global Warming Potential about 27 times higher than CO2).

Real Tree (Burned/Incinerated): this generated about 3.5 kg CO₂e per year, which is better than landfill, especially if it’s burnt in energy recovery facilities, where the heat is used for some other purpose.

Potted/Replantable Tree: This one is the winner in the long-term—roughly 20 kg CO₂e over 10 years if cared for and reused annually.

Annual CO2 Impact Comparison

Bottom line:

If you already own an artificial tree: keep using it as long as possible.

If you want a real tree: choose local, and compost or incinerate responsibly.

If you want the greenest choice, go for a potted tree which you can reuse or replant.

Sources:

  • Carbon Trust – Life Cycle Assessment of Christmas Trees
  • Zurich Insurance – Sustainability tips for festive season
  • ADEME (Agence de la Transition Écologique) – Environmental impact of natural vs artificial trees

First summer in our Passivhaus: comfort, coolness and energy savings

I’ve worked on Passivhaus projects for more than a decade now, based here in Catalonia, north-east Spain. I came across the standard when I was doing a Masters in Architecture, Energy and Environmental studies at Centre for Alternative Technology in Wales (UK).

First summer in our Passivhaus: comfort, coolness and energy savings

By Oliver Style, Praxis CEO

I’ve worked on Passivhaus projects for more than a decade now, based here in Catalonia, north-east Spain. I came across the standard when I was doing a Masters in Architecture, Energy and Environmental studies at Centre for Alternative Technology in Wales (UK). Passivhaus resonated with me…it made sense: to design, build, and retrofit buildings that are super comfortable, need very little energy and radically reduce CO2 emissions. So choosing a passive house was a way of living more coherently, and a personal statement of intent to fight against the climate emergency…of living better, with less.

It wasn’t until last year that I was able to take part in the design and construction of my own Passivhaus, Can Naiades, a prefabricated lightweight timber frame house located about 40 kilometres northeast of Barcelona, with a useful floor area of 128m2. Having heard from many clients about how wonderful it is to live in a Passivhaus, it’s quite different to experience it first-hand. What does it feel like? It feels solid, comfortable, and quiet. It feels safe, airy and light. It is everything I’ve never had in any of the houses I’ve previously lived in and complained about. It really is, GREAT!

Primer verano en nuestra Passivhaus

Surfing the heat waves

We moved in at the end of May 2025 and walked slap bang into the middle of a major heat wave, with average temperatures around 4 ºC higher than previous years and peaks of 37 ºC. Walking outside was like stepping into a furnace. We had no blinds for all of June and July (they were only installed in August), but despite that, it was wonderfully cool and comfortable. We did- of course- have our (one) air conditioning unit on quite a lot…but even so, our energy use from June-October was 3 % lower than predicted with the (calibrated) PHPP energy model. Fantastic!

The house has really worked a treat this first summer. Plenty of people complain that lots of insulation and airtightness means passive houses overheat in the summer. But, despite large amounts of glazing, Can Naiades has kept us nice and cool all summer, with 96% of our energy use coming directly from the solar PV panels and battery bank.

Temperature-wise, there is a noticeable difference between the ground floor (which has a big fat concrete floor slab with lots of thermal inertia), and the 1st floor (which has very little thermal mass). Heat rises of course, so to some degree that’s as expected…but a bit of thermal inertia really does help shave the peaks of those daily temperature swings.

Powered by the sun

Between June and October, we used only 137 kWh from the grid. We got our grid feed-in connection legalised at the end of September, so in October, 57% of the energy we generated with the PV panels we used in the house and pumped the remaining 43% into the grid…clean, fossil-fuel-free electricity.

And then we got our 1st energy bill: 19 € for the month of August, of which only 3€ was for the electricity we consumed from the grid (in total 18 kWh, or 0.15 €/m2). In the 80m2 flat we used to live in, we used 475 kWh the previous August and paid 95 € for a month of electricity (1.19 €/m2)…that’s 87% less (in €/m²). Bargain!

It’s a wrap!

I remember a friend telling me once, that the only problem with living in a Passivhaus is that you don’t sleep very well when you go and stay anywhere else! There are still a lot of jobs to finish in the house and we’re skint, so we’re not going very far for the foreseeable future…but I can confirm: living in a Passivhaus is a dream come true, especially in a Mediterranean summer!

But it shouldn’t be a luxury: it should be normal, and within everyone’s reach. In the context of a serious housing crisis in many European countries, decent, comfortable, and efficient homes should be accessible to the majority of the population- especially for low-income families, who often live in a situation of energy poverty. Both the public and private sector need to work to make this a reality.

For more tecnical information about the project, have a look at this article.

Can Naiades: professionals & contractors

Can Naiades: components and systems

  • Insulation: Panel Plus TP138, Smart Wall FKD-N Thermal, Knauf Insulation
  • Specialist insulation: Nanoboard Aerogel, Pafile
  • Timber structure: EGOIN
  • Windows: Smartwin Compact, Ventanas Gardea
  • Window subframes: ISO-TOP construction sheets WF3, Iso Chemie
  • Airtightness tapes & membranes: SIGA & Onhaus
  • Liquid airtight membrane and radon gas barrier: Soudatight SP & LQ, Soudal
  • Radon gas sensors: Bequerel
  • Control & monitoring system: Loxone
  • Rainwater catchment tank: Simop 6328
  • Grey water treatment system: Intewa Aqualoop, Ecospai 
  • Shading devices: Solomatic II 80 FIX, Griesser España
  • Rooflight: DEC-C U8 + AMZ/C Z-Wave awning blind, Fakro
  • Heat pump (heating, cooling, hot water): Aquarea Ecoflex, Panasonic
  • DHW heat recovery systems: Zypho iZi 30 & Zypho PiPe 65, Aliaxis
  • MVHR unit: Zehnder ComfoAir Q450 ERV + ComfoClime Q, Zehnder
  • Solar PV system: 21 TwinPeak5 410W PV panels; 1 Primo GEN24 8.0 Plus hybrid inverter; BYD B-Box Premium HVM 13.8kW battery bank, Prot Energia

Overheating analysis in a Healthcare Facility: enhancing thermal comfort and energy efficiency

At Praxis Resilient Buildings, we conducted a detailed thermodynamic simulation to evaluate the summer performance of a multi-storey healthcare building.

Overheating analysis in a Healthcare Facility: enhancing thermal comfort and energy efficiency.

A thermodynamic simulation-based approach.

At Praxis Resilient Buildings, we conducted a detailed thermodynamic simulation to evaluate the summer performance of a multi-storey healthcare building. The study aimed to identify optimal glazing specifications together with natural and mechanical ventilation design strategies to mitigate overheating and ensure comfort without excessive reliance on mechanical cooling.

Mejora del confort térmico y análisis de sobrecalentamiento en un edificio sanitario: un enfoque basado en simulaciones termodinámicas

Climate File and Simulation Tools

The analysis used the IWEC II climate file for Barcelona (ASHRAE), providing reliable long-term hourly data. The simulation was carried out with DesignBuilder v7.1 and EnergyPlus v9.4.

Base Case and Model Assumptions

Key features of the thermal envelope:

  • High-performance façade insulation (U = 0.157 W/m²·K)
  • Low-emissivity double glazing with solar control (Ug = 1.40, g = 40%)
  • Air tightness: n50 = 3.0 ACH
  • Active cooling with fan-coil units and an air-to-water heat pump
  • Constant air volume (CAV) mechanical ventilation with 70% heat recovery and a cooling coil

Cooling setpoints:

  • Weekdays: 24 °C (day) / 28 °C (night)
  • Weekends: 28 °C (all day)

Simulation Variants

The study explored five summer scenarios:

  1. Base Case
  2. Solar-control glazing and skylights
  3. Natural ventilation in the atrium
  4. Cooled ventilation air supply to the atrium
  5. All combined strategies

Additionally, two façade glazing types were compared:

  • Low-e glazing (g = 57%)
  • Low-e + solar control glazing (g = 40%)

Key Findings

  • Combined passive strategies reduced peak temperatures in circulation and waiting areas on the 3rd and 4th floors by between 7 and 9°C.
  • Solar control glazing alone reduced solar gains by 40%, making differentiated glazing by façade unnecessary.
  • The best performance was achieved with solar-control glazing + natural ventilation + cooled ventilation supply air to the atrium.

Glazing specification

Based on the simulation outcomes:

  • Façade windows: Double glazing, low-e + solar control: Ug = 1.40 W/m²·K, g = 40%
  • Skylights: Double glazing with solar control: Ug = 1.80 W/m²·K, g = 18%

Conclusion

The thermodynamic simulations demonstrate that a strategic combination of solar control glazing, natural ventilation, and cooled ventilation supply air can effectively manage overheating in summer. These findings support smart, passive-first design decisions in healthcare environments, reducing HVAC loads while enhancing occupant comfort.

Two Praxis Projects Win at the Green Solutions Awards 2024–2025

We’re thrilled to announce that two projects we’ve been deeply involved in—Mirador de Gracia in Barcelona and Guacamayas in Puerto Madero, Colombia—have taken home top honours in this year’s Green Solutions Awards 2024–2025.

Two Praxis Projects Win at the Green Solutions Awards 2024–2025

We’re thrilled to announce that two projects we’ve been deeply involved in—Mirador de Gracia in Barcelona and Guacamayas in Puerto Madero, Colombia—have taken home top honours in this year’s Green Solutions Awards 2024–2025.

The Green Solutions Awards, organised by the Construction21 platform, aim to spotlight exemplary buildings that offer real-world answers to climate challenges. We’re proud to see both of these very different—but equally inspiring—projects recognised on this stage.

Dos proyectos de Praxis ganan en los Green Solutions Awards 2024–2025

From the jury

“The project’s focus on elderly people’s comfort and its highly energy-efficient systems make it a great example of sustainability.”
Full case study

New Construction Grand Prize – Spain

Mirador de Gracia Senior Residence, Barcelona

Mirador de Gracia is a nine-storey, fully electric care home located in the heart of Barcelona. It’s the first certified Passive House building of its type in Catalonia, designed with one clear goal: comfort for its elderly residents, without compromising on sustainability.

Working closely with GENARS (Joaquim Rigau), FIATC Residencias, Arnó Infraestructuras, and Agefred, we supported the project with advanced thermodynamic simulation and Passivhaus design throughout the process.

Despite a challenging urban context and the complexities of achieving airtightness in a large building (n50 = 0.6 ach!), the result is a super-efficient, all-electric building packed with innovation—including heat recovery ventilation with automated flow rate control, solar PV, and a high performance thermal envelope. The goal? To smash the metrics that matter: comfort, energy use, and long-term resilience.

Health & Comfort Prize + Special Mention for Hot Climates

Guacamayas, Puerto Madero, Cartagena, Colombia

The Guacamayas duplexes- developed by Andrew Strauss of Cosinfra and Enrique Bueno of E+ Buildings- are part of the pioneering Puerto Madero eco-housing project in Cartagena, Colombia.

This one was a certifier’s dream and challenge in equal measure: hot and humid tropical climate, year-round average temps of 28ºC+, and very high solar gains. And yet, with a carefully detailed passive design approach—including orientation, shading, insulation, and airtight construction—the buildings achieved a stunning 90% reduction in energy demand compared to conventional builds.

From the jury

“The project’s passive approach drastically reduces energy consumption and illustrates what sustainable buildings could look like in tropical climates.”
Full case study

What these awards tell us

Whether it’s a multi-storey care home in the Mediterranean or duplex homes in coastal Colombia, the core message is the same: Passive House design delivers. Performance, comfort, health, and real carbon savings—adapted to place, climate, and user needs.

A massive thanks and congratulations to all the collaborators who made these projects happen. Onwards!

Towards Greener Building Codes: The New Sustainability Document in Spain’s CTE Building Regulations

Sustainability is set to take on a more prominent role in Spain’s building regulations. The upcoming revision of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE).

Towards Greener Building Codes: The New Sustainability Document in Spain’s CTE Building Regulations

Sustainability is set to take on a more prominent role in Spain’s building regulations. The upcoming revision of the Código Técnico de la Edificación (CTE), expected in 2026, will introduce a new section: the Basic Document on Environmental Sustainability (DB-SA). This new regulation aims to integrate more robust environmental criteria into the design, construction, and operation of buildings across Spain.

Towards Greener Building Codes: The New Sustainability Document in Spain's CTE
Towards Greener Building Codes: The New Sustainability Document in Spain's CTE

What is the DB-SA?

The DB-SA will be a new section within the CTE that introduces mandatory requirements for assessing the environmental impact of buildings throughout their entire life cycle. The goal is to support decarbonisation and circular economy practices in the built environment by requiring more data-driven sustainability measures.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

At the heart of the DB-SA is the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. This approach evaluates a building’s carbon footprint from raw material extraction through construction, use, and demolition. The LCA provides a complete picture of environmental impact across every phase of a building’s life.

Focus on Material Carbon Footprint

The regulation will promote the use of low-carbon construction materials, encouraging products that generate fewer emissions during manufacturing, transport, and installation. Product Environmental Declarations (EPDs) will play a key role in demonstrating performance.

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Beyond the building envelope, the DB-SA will support the deployment of renewable energy systems and reinforce energy efficiency strategies to minimise overall environmental impact. These measures complement the existing energy-related requirements in DB-HE.

Towards Greener Building Codes: The New Sustainability Document in Spain's CTE

Aligned with EU Level(s) Framework

The DB-SA will be aligned with Level(s), the European Commission’s voluntary sustainability framework for buildings. This will help harmonise environmental metrics across the EU and support compliance with European climate goals.

Integration into the Energy Performance Certificate

LCA results and carbon footprint data will be integrated into the Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) of each building, expanding the EPC’s scope beyond operational energy use to include embodied emissions and material impact.

Public Consultation and Timeline

A public consultation for the new DB-SA took place in October 2024, gathering feedback from stakeholders across the sector. Final approval is expected in the second half of 2026, according to the Ministry of Transport, Mobility and Urban Agenda.

Conclusion

The introduction of the DB-SA marks a major step forward in climate-aligned building regulation in Spain. By requiring full lifecycle carbon accounting and encouraging low-impact design strategies, the CTE is evolving toward a future of net-zero, resource-efficient buildings.

Optimising thermal comfort and energy efficiency in a sports hall: a thermodynamic simulation study

Praxis Resilient Buildings conducted an advanced thermodynamic simulation study to assess and improve the thermal performance of the new sports hall in Vila-seca.

Optimising thermal comfort and energy efficiency in a sports hall: a thermodynamic simulation study

Praxis Resilient Buildings conducted an advanced thermodynamic simulation study to assess and improve the thermal performance of the new sports hall in Vila-seca, Tarragona, designed by Pere Buil of vora arquitectes. This technical analysis was undertaken to guide design strategies for natural ventilation, solar control, and thermal envelope specification.

Optimizando el confort térmico y la eficiencia energética en un pabellón polideportivo en Vilaseca: un estudio de simulación termodinámica

Climate and simulation tools

The Reus Airport IWEC II climate file (ASHRAE) was used to simulate outdoor conditions. With the airport located only 10km from the new sports hall, the data set provided a reliable foundation for analysing seasonal thermal loads and comfort.

Building envelope and baseline performance

The base-case building envelope included:

  • Uninsulated floor slab (U = 1.77 W/m²·K)
  • 13 cm of insulation in the walls (U = 0.29 W/m²·K)
  • 30 cm of insulation in the roof (U = 0.15 W/m²·K)
  • Standard double glazing (Ug = 2.8 W/m²·K, g = 71%)
  • n50 = 3.0 ACH
  • Lighting power density: 4.5 W/m²

Natural ventilation was enabled in the simulations when indoor air temperature exceeded 14°C and was higher than outdoor air temperature.

Design variables studied

Several strategies were evaluated across typical winter (January) and summer (July) weeks:

  • Natural ventilation vs. uncontrolled infiltration-only
  • Slab insulation (10 cm)
  • Low-emissivity glazing
  • Solar control glazing
  • High-emissivity EPDM roof finish
  • Daylight-responsive lighting control

Key winter findings

  • Ventilation: Passive ventilation achieved >20,000 m³/h airflow without wind, thanks to cross-ventilation and stack effect.
  • Comfort: Operative temperatures dropped below 14°C during early mornings but recovered due to internal gains.
  • Humidity: Relative humidity remained below 70% during occupancy.
  • Insulated slab: Surprisingly, this lead to worsened night-time comfort due to less heat input from the relatively warmer subsoil.
  • Glazing and roof finishes: Minimal impact on comfort.

Key summer findings

  • Temperature: Operative temps remained below outdoor conditions, peaking at 28°C thanks to efficient heat evacuation.
  • Natural ventilation: >18,000 m³/h airflow enabled through stack and cross ventilation.
  • Humidity: Passive ventilation kept RH <76% during weekdays.
  • Solar control glazing: Delivered up to 2°C cooling benefit; however, cost-benefit vs. external shading warrants further study.

Lighting control and energy savings

  • Daylight control showed negligible thermal impact but slashed electricity consumption by 88-90%, making it a highly recommended strategy.

Hourly overheating and overcooling analysis

  • <14°C (overcooling): 16% of annual occupied hours
  • >26°C (overheating): 19% of annual occupied hours

Recommendations

  • Skip slab insulation: Not beneficial for thermal comfort
  • Prioritise natural ventilation: Highly effective with stack and cross ventlation
  • Low-e and/or solar control glazing brings little benefit
  • External shading devices: required for the highly glazed north-west facing façade
  • Implement daylighting control: Significant electrical savings
  • Maintain 30 cm roof insulation regardless of surface finish

Control System Design

An automated Building Management System (BMS) is recommended, with sensors for:

  • Outdoor conditions: Temperature, RH, wind, rain
  • Indoor conditions: CO₂, temperature, humidity at 3 interior points
  • Motorised control of facade and roof openings based on thresholds

Conclusion

The simulation study provided robust insights into how passive strategies can be fine-tuned to optimise comfort and reduce energy use in a mixed-mode, non-conditioned sports hall. With careful implementation, the Vilaseca pavilion stands to become a benchmark in passive design for educational sports infrastructure in Catalonia.

Preventing overheating in classrooms: a thermodynamic simulation study in Barcelona

As climate change intensifies summer heatwaves, ensuring thermal comfort in educational buildings is becoming a top priority

Preventing overheating in classrooms: a thermodynamic simulation study in Barcelona

Prevención del sobrecalentamiento en aulas: un estudio de simulación termodinámica en Barcelona
Plano aula

As climate change intensifies summer heatwaves, ensuring thermal comfort in educational buildings – particularly in Mediterranean cities like Barcelona – is becoming a top priority. In this post, we explore the results of a detailed thermodynamic simulation study assessing the risk of overheating in two classrooms of a primary school located in Barcelona.

The study was commissioned to understand how effectively a dedicated outdoor air system with an Air Halding Unit supplying a constant 14 °C, could maintain thermal comfort from May to September * with no additional zone thermostat controls or zone dampers.  No optimisation of the thermal envelope was considered in the study.

* Schools shut in Spain from the end of June until September. However, for the simulations, July and August were included in the simulations, to have results under more challenging climate conditions. This was also done as the climate file is based on historical data. Currently, weather conditions that typically occurred in July now often occur in May.

Objectives of the Study

The simulation aimed to answer three key questions:

  1. How many hours during summer school hours do classrooms exceed 27 °C, despite cooled air being supplied at 14 °C?
  2. What is the optimal relationship between outdoor air temperature and supply air temperature to prevent both overheating and overcooling, with a lower limit of 14 °C for supply air?
  3. How does solar exposure differ between east- and west-facing classrooms, and how does this impact thermal comfort?

Simulation Tools and Model

  • Software Used: Simulations were carried out using DesignBuilder with the EnergyPlus calculation engine.
  • Climate Data: The IWEC II weather file for Barcelona–Airport, developed by ASHRAE, was used, based on long-term hourly data.
  • Building Model: The model includes two identical classrooms—one facing east, the other west—located on the third floor of a school. The corridor between them runs north–south. Internal floors and walls were modelled as adiabatic.
  • Envelope Performance: Building envelope parameters meet the minimum requirements of Spain’s CTE HE1 code for Climate Zone C (Barcelona). Windows are double glazed (Ug = 1.80 W/m²K) with a visible transmittance of 79% and a solar factor of 59%. The external wall has U = 0.49 W/m2·K, the roof has U = 0.40 W/m2·K and air permeability is n50 = 3 ach.
  • Solar Shading: Each classroom includes external fixed shading devices with a 50% reduction factor, simulating expanded metal mesh (deployé).

Internal Conditions and HVAC Configuration

  • Occupancy and Internal Loads: Each classroom is 60 m², with 31 pupils and one adult teacher. Lighting and equipment are only active during teaching hours (Mon–Fri, 08:00–18:00), though lighting is off in summer.
  • Ventilation Strategy: A central AHU supplies 100% fresh air at a flow rate of 45 m³/h per person (1395 m3/h per classroom), with 79% sensible and 62% latent heat recovery efficiency.
  • Cooling System: A air-water heat pump cools water to 7 °C, which is supplied to the AHU cooling coil, cooling the supply air to a constant 14 °C during summer school hours. The simulations assume this is also the respective zone supply air temperature (which in practice will not be the case due to heat gains/losses in the ductwork). In May and September, a dual-setpoint strategy is used to reduce overcooling:
    · Outdoor T < 16 °C → Supply air at 20 °C
    · Outdoor T > 17 °C → Supply air at 14 °C
Internatl confort range

Comfort Criteria

Thermal comfort was evaluated using the following thresholds:

  • Too Cold: Operative temperature ≤ 22 °C
  • Optimum comfort range: 22 °C – 27 °C, with minimum RH = 30% and maximum RH = 60% @ 26 ºC
  • Too Hot: Operative temperature ≥ 27 °C

The analysis focused on school hours only, from May to September.

Key Results

External Climate Overview (08:00–18:00, Mon–Fri)

Minimum, average and maximum outdoor dry air temperatures for each of the months simulated are shown in the Figure below:

Key Results

Overheating Risk – Summary (% of teaching hours > 27 °C)

The table below shows the overheating risk assessment for each classroom and month:

Overheating Risk – Summary (% of teaching hours > 27 °C)

The East-facing classroom experienced overheating in July and September, principally due to morning solar gains. The West-facing classroom, by contrast, performed slightly better, with only 1% of overheating in September.

Overcooling Risk – Summary (% of teaching hours < 22 °C)

The table below shows the overcooling risk assessment for each classroom and month:

Overcooling Risk – Summary (% of teaching hours < 22 °C)

Slight overcooling was observed in May and September in the West classroom, highlighting the impact of delayed solar exposure in the morning. The following Figures show the results in graphic form for May, July and September.

Key Takeaways

  1. The central HVAC system generally maintains comfort during most of the school hours across both classrooms, despite the absence of zone-level temperature control.
  2. Orientation matters: The East classroom heats up faster in the morning, while the West classroom is more prone to overcooling early in the day, especially in shoulder seasons.
  3. July presents the greatest overheating risk, with internal operative temperatures exceeding 27 °C in the East classroom during 7% of teaching hours, despite the 14 °C supply air.
  4. Overcooling is avoided through a well-designed dual-setpoint strategy in May and September, where supply air is adjusted depending on outdoor temperature.
  5. Accurate commissioning is essential. Given the centralised nature of the system, delivering the correct airflow and temperature to each classroom is critical to ensuring real-world performance matches the simulation.

Final Thoughts

This simulation underscores the importance thoughtful but simple HVAC control logic in preventing thermal discomfort in classrooms. In warm climates like Barcelona, small improvements in system design and control can make a significant difference in educational outcomes and energy efficiency, using simple controls. For space cooling with 100 % outdoor air systems in larger buildings with long ventilation duct runs, it’s important to consider pressure losses and heat gains as cool air moves through the ductwork, and how this may impact flow rates and air temperature at the supply air grilles in each classroom.

Although not included in the study, it’s also essential to include and optimise passive design strategies (thermal insulation, window specification, airtightness, external shading devices, external “cool colours” and reduction of internal heat gains) to improve thermal comfort and reduce energy consumption.

As we move toward more resilient and climate-adaptive buildings, this study provides a clear example of how digital tools like EnergyPlus and DesignBuilder can inform evidence-based design decisions.

Pavelló Illa: Barcelona’s new sports hub looks good, keeps cool and saves energy

Located in the dense urban fabric of Barcelona, Pavelló Illa is a new sports centre that stands out for its sensitive integration into a complex context.

Pavelló Illa: Barcelona’s new sports hub looks good, keeps cool and saves energy

Pavelló Illa: Diseño Pasivo y Simulación Energética en la Barcelona Urbana

Located in the dense urban fabric of Barcelona, Pavelló Illa is a new sports centre that stands out for its sensitive integration into a complex context. Anna Noguera, who co-designed the building with AIA Arquitectura i Instal·lacions, describes the project’s guiding principles:

“Designed as a light, translucent volume nestled between local schools and the massive Illa Diagonal shopping complex, the building acts as a mediating element—functioning by day as a sunlit interior and by night as a luminous urban lantern.”

From the outset, the project has embraced passive energy design and materials with a low environmental footprint. The structural system combines steel with CLT (cross-laminated timber), offering multiple benefits: reduced embodied energy, a lower overall carbon footprint, and improved possibilities for future disassembly and material reuse. The use of an industrialised timber system not only streamlines construction but also aligns with circular economy principles.

Praxis Resilient Buildings contributed to the project through an in-depth thermodynamic simulation study with the DesignBuilder tool, using EnergyPlus for thermal and natural ventilation modelling and radiance. The goal was to assess and optimise the building’s environmental performance throughout the year.

Our work focused on:

  • Solar gain analysis on the translucent thermal envelope to inform shading strategies.
  • Natural ventilation performance, including airflow modelling, opening controls, and seasonal flow rates.
  • Summer overheating risk reduction through integrated passive measures.
  • Daylighting studies to balance visual comfort with energy performance.
  • The thermal impact of green façades and vegetated areas, contributing to both internal comfort and urban heat island mitigation.

This holistic approach has helped shape a sports facility that is not only architecturally responsive but also performs exceptionally well from an energy and comfort perspective—offering a replicable model for resilient and sustainable public architecture in urban environments.

The Health Risks of Noise and the Passivhaus Solution

Noise pollution is an often-overlooked environmental hazard that has significant health implications.

The Health Risks of Noise and the Passivhaus Solution

Los riesgos del ruido para la salud y la solución Passivhaus

Noise pollution is an often-overlooked environmental hazard that has significant health implications. Chronic exposure to high noise levels is linked to stress, cardiovascular diseases, sleep disturbances, and reduced cognitive function. In urban environments, residents frequently contend with traffic, construction, and industrial noise, which can lead to long-term health consequences.

Traditional buildings often fail to provide adequate acoustic insulation, allowing external noise to penetrate living spaces. Poorly sealed windows, insufficient wall insulation, and gaps in building envelopes contribute to heightened indoor noise levels, reducing occupant comfort and well-being.

Passivhaus buildings, designed for maximum energy efficiency and thermal comfort, also excel in acoustic performance. The high-performance envelopes, triple-glazed windows, and airtight construction work together to significantly reduce noise infiltration. Additionally, the use of controlled mechanical ventilation systems ensures fresh air circulation without the need for open windows, further minimizing external noise intrusion.

Studies have shown that residents of Passivhaus-certified homes experience lower stress levels and improved sleep quality due to the superior acoustic insulation. By mitigating environmental noise, these buildings contribute to better mental and physical health, aligning energy efficiency with occupant well-being. As cities grow noisier, the role of Passivhaus in providing peaceful, healthy indoor environments becomes increasingly vital.